Sustainability: Out-Live Out-Last Out-Reach
log in
Welcome, guest
Keynote Audio Intro
Keynote Paper
Keynote Discussion
Poster Hall
Discussants Reflect
Whos Here
Open Discussion
Info Center
 Floor Plan
 Home  Poster Hall  Who's Here  Info Center  Keynote Address  Poster Hall  Keynote Address  Panels Discussants Reflect  Keynote Discussion
Keynote: Discussion

 Read Posts on This Topic

Posted by: Brian Drayton
Posted on: May 02, 2002 at 1:22 PM
Many "systemic reforms" are actually subject-specific: the State Systemic Initiatives were math or science, the LSCs are math or science, other districts are engaging in a literacy-centered reform, and so on.
It seems to me that this tends to create a dilemma for the district: the science faculty (let us say) forms itself into communities of learners, and these are linked to a teacher PD system of some kind across the district. Meanwhile, the history or foreign language departments are not doing anything of the kind.
In the interests of program coherence, you'd expect that many districts in the end woudl eliminate the anomalous (new) program -- Doesn't the "divided mind" of a district pose the greatest challenge to LSC-type innovations?

Futher Replies or Comments

Home | Keynote | Poster Hall | Panels | Discussants Reflect | Resources | Who's Here | Open Discussion | Info Center
© TERC 2002, all rights reserved.